Catch silent failures fast

Because a trace can say “success” when the user still got nothing useful. We read every trace alongside the conversation, map it back to the user, and catch the silent failures: the agent says it sent the PDF but it never arrived, or confidently answers the wrong question. You see how many users hit it, the traces behind it, and what to fix.

For a handful of chats, absolutely. But you are not going to keep pasting every new trace into Claude, working out which failures are the same, and checking whether they are getting worse. Agnost does that across your real traffic and keeps the conversation and trace next to every insight.

The honest answer: we process the conversation data you choose to send us. Use pseudonymous IDs and redact secrets or sensitive fields before ingestion; transport uses HTTPS and dashboard access is authenticated. We do not pretend to automatically redact PII for you. If your team needs a security review, DPA, or a specific deployment setup, talk to us directly.

You do not need to rebuild your agent or change how it works. Connect the events and conversations you already have, inspect one staging trace to make sure you are happy with what is being sent, and then turn it on. The point is to get insight from real traffic, not create another implementation project.

Yeah. We are early, and we want to be in the loop with you: looking at what users are hitting, deciding what is actually worth fixing, and helping turn that into a better prompt, product flow, or eval. You can talk to the founders directly.